1999 Concorde Timing Belt

Discussion in 'Concorde' started by sdosborne, Jul 4, 2007.

  1. sdosborne

    sdosborne Guest

    The timing belt broke on my 1999 3.2L Concorde at about 80k miles.

    I replaced the timing belt, water pump, and tensioner. Now it is running
    rough (like it is out of time) and I get the following codes:
    P0341
    P1297
    P1391
    P1684.

    Any suggestions?

    Thanks in advance

    Sam
     
    sdosborne, Jul 4, 2007
    #1
  2. sdosborne

    Joe Pfeiffer Guest

    Find out what the codes mean?
     
    Joe Pfeiffer, Jul 4, 2007
    #2
  3. sdosborne

    Bill Putney Guest

    That is an interference engine (i.e., if pistons and valve train loose
    synchronization from the timing belt, the valves hit the pistons when
    the pistons are at TDC). You likely have some damaged valves.

    That doesn't mean you also don't have it mis-timed. Need to look up the
    codes.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jul 4, 2007
    #3
  4. sdosborne

    maxpower Guest

    Sam, you are going to have to clear the fault codes and see which ones come
    back. Since your belt broke when it was running some of those faults may
    have been set before the belt was installed. P1297 No change in Map. P1391
    Int loss of cam or crank and I have no idea what the others are.They are
    not in the manual. Possibly your code reader given you false data

    Glenn Beasley
    Chrysler Tech
     
    maxpower, Jul 4, 2007
    #4
  5. sdosborne

    Bill Putney Guest

    "P1684 is only a status which indicates that the PCM memory has been
    cleared within the last 50 ignition cycles and does not indicate a problem."

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jul 4, 2007
    #5
  6. sdosborne

    april1st Guest

    P0341 seems to be indicative of an issue with the "range/performance
    of the camshaft position sensor"

    Again, it is not obvious whether the code was set when the belt broke
    or whether it was set after.

    As Bill pointed out this is an interference engine -- you may want to
    check compression on each cylinder to see whether it is similar.

    I also remember that on this engine you have quite a range for the
    position of each of the cam pulleys -- the crankshaft has a precise
    position (arrows have to align), while the cams have to be "between
    the two dots". The FSM advises you to mark the exact position as to
    where the cams are at TDC (obviously this would not work in your
    case). I think there is a possiiblity that one or both of the cams
    might be off by one tooth -- that's the range I think.

    You can probably run the engine without the crankshaft pulley and the
    accessory belts for a short while if you simply need to check wether
    the engine is OK.

    You may consider a simple method of trial and error -- there are
    roughly two possible positions for each of the cams, thus you would
    need to try at most four permutations to eliminate the timing issue as
    a possibility.

    Unfortunately, most likely the roughness is due to damaged valves/
    pistons -- there was a post on www.dodgeintrepid.net forums about a
    timing belt breaking -- when they installed a new one the engine ran
    rough -- when checked compression discovered that it was much lower on
    2 cylinders as compared to the rest -- at the end the guy had to
    replace both heads.
     
    april1st, Jul 4, 2007
    #6
  7. sdosborne

    april1st Guest

    Here is the post I was alluding to earlier -- the codes thrown are
    pretty similar

    http://www.dodgeintrepid.net/forums/showthread.php?p=1008585&mode=linear#post1008585

    Thanks,

    Alex
     
    april1st, Jul 4, 2007
    #7
  8. sdosborne

    Bill Putney Guest

    Same scenario recently posted on the 300M Club (300M has essentially the
    same exact engine - bored to different displacement):
    http://300mclub.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14580&highlight=head

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jul 4, 2007
    #8
  9. I appreciate all the replies. I was told that the 3.2L was a non-
    interference engine. I guess he was wrong. I'll check compression tomorrow
    and go from there.

    Thanks again

    Sam
     
    sdosborne via CarKB.com, Jul 5, 2007
    #9
  10. sdosborne

    Bill Putney Guest

    You're welcome.

    Oh - also the factory service manuals also state that the 3.2/3.5L
    engines are interference.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    address with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Jul 5, 2007
    #10
  11. sdosborne

    philthy Guest

    under the very right conditions you can damage a valve but it does not occur
    very often
     
    philthy, Jul 6, 2007
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.