1999 Chrysler T&C - Speed Sensor fails 2nd time in 4 month

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by IPavlov, Apr 16, 2005.

  1. IPavlov

    IPavlov Guest

    Hi,

    Just four months ago, in December I wrote about the speed
    sensor problem in my 1999 T&C in this thread:
    http://groups-beta.google.com/group...=IPavlov+speed+sensor&rnum=2#a0ea197303d22d9d

    All the helpful advice in this group helped me then to quickly
    identify and solve the problem. The sensor was replaced in
    transmission repair shop and my van was back in business for
    four additional month. But then, what seems to be exactly the same
    problem, happened again... All the same symptoms - a little jerkiness
    in transmission, limp mode again and "service engine soon" light
    on again.
    I'm wondering now is it that these speed sensors have such high
    failure rate, that I hit it second time within a few month or
    is it just my luck?
    I'm also thinking: could it be the sign of some deeper problem
    that causes speed sensor to fail again and again and what that
    deeper problem might be? - Could it be incorrect wiring or
    may be overheating of the area where the speed sensor is
    located or something else?
    Also, does it make sense to go to the same shop and ask them
    to replace the sensor under the warranty since it is only four
    month since they replaced it?

    Any advice will be greatly appreciated.

    IP.
     
    IPavlov, Apr 16, 2005
    #1
  2. IPavlov

    maxpower Guest

    There are 2 sensors that could cause that problem, the input and output
    speed sensor, Did they replace both of them?? The output sensor always
    causes the speedo to not work.
    Glenn Beasley
    Chrysler Tech
     
    maxpower, Apr 16, 2005
    #2
  3. IPavlov

    IPavlov Guest

    Thank you for asking the question. - It made me remember now:
    First time this happened speedo didn't work, but now it is working.
    Apart from this difference, everything else is the same.
    So it must have been output sensor the first time and input this
    time around.
    Also I think they replaced only sensor that didn't work - output.
    Repair cost me $72, which is probably too little for replacing the
    pair of them, the price of one without labor being about $30.

    Additional question: Is it typical for these sensors to break down
    after certain time or mileage? The fact that they broke one after
    another makes me think that it is either that or some other deeper
    problem.

    Thanks for you help.
     
    IPavlov, Apr 16, 2005
    #3
  4. IPavlov

    Shep Guest

    How do you know it is the sensor again, did you have it scanned, there are
    several other situations that can cause the cel and subsequent limp mode
    operation.
     
    Shep, Apr 16, 2005
    #4
  5. IPavlov

    IPavlov Guest

    You are right. - It was too early to jump to the conclusion that it
    is the same sensor. In fact it looks more likely that it is an input
    sensor while he first time it was the output one. - See reply by
    "maxpower" in this thread.

    I'll take the van to repairs Monday morning and hope this problem
    will be diagnosed and fixed.
    What other conditions may cause the limp mode? I guess sensors
    failure is not the most serious of them.

    IP.
     
    IPavlov, Apr 16, 2005
    #5
  6. IPavlov

    maxpower Guest

    I have seen these sensors go out very early, and some that just don't go
    bad,I keep a set of them in my wife's 2003 Sebring just as a safety
    precaution, I would check to see what the fault code is before just tossing
    parts at it.
     
    maxpower, Apr 16, 2005
    #6
  7. IPavlov

    Bill Putney Guest

    Yep - same sensor part numbers are used on many DC cars of the last
    several years. It is well known and accepted that they fail
    periodically (they are magnetic/metal sensing type sensors, and my guess
    is that the magnets just gradually weaken until they cross the threshold
    of working/not working - supported by the fact that they often get
    intermittent/temperature/speed dependent - tranny going in and out of
    limp mode several times on same trip, etc.). I know that many frequent
    flyers on the 300M Enthusiasts Club keep spares in the glove
    compartment. *SO*, statistically, it would not be such a strange
    occurence for failures of the two sensors to occur within a couple of
    months of each other (happened to me on my '99 Concorde - both times it
    was a sensor - first one, then the other - I forget which was the first
    to go).

    FWIW, it may be that the output sensors *seem* to fail when they
    actually would work again by cleaning accumulated metal particles off
    the tip (the sensor sends pulses to the computer generated by the cogs
    of a spline passing by it - if the sensor tip gets coated with metal
    particles, it senses metal all the time so pulses don't get generated.
    *BUT* for the $20-30 they cost, and the time it takes to clean one vs.
    replacing one being identical, it's hardly worth trying to salvage one
    that may or may not work with a cleaning - i.e., might as well replace it.

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Apr 17, 2005
    #7
  8. IPavlov

    maxpower Guest

    So where do you keep your spare ones at now Bill?
     
    maxpower, Apr 17, 2005
    #8
  9. IPavlov

    Bill Putney Guest

    I don't keep spares. I walk on the wild side! 8^)

    Bill Putney
    (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
    adddress with the letter 'x')
     
    Bill Putney, Apr 17, 2005
    #9
  10. IPavlov

    maxpower Guest

    Thats like saying she loves me she loves me not, she loves me......etc
     
    maxpower, Apr 17, 2005
    #10
  11. IPavlov

    IPavlov Guest

    Talking of the wild-side... It really makes me weary taking
    the long trips with this van - you never know when one of
    these sensors will fail again. Even if I kept spare ones I
    wouldn't know how to replace them. It was mentioned on this
    group that it is easy, but I opened the hood and couldn't
    even locate the transmission, let alone replace the sensor.
    Also I noticed that when they did it in the shop they
    lifted the car and did some work underneath it, so it means
    the transmission is somewhere underneath, which would
    probably make it hard to do this type of work while
    stopping on the side of the road if it breaks down on
    the long trip unless you crawl under the car.
    I think it is high time for Chrysler's engineers to think
    how to make their cars more reliable.

    IP.
     
    IPavlov, Apr 17, 2005
    #11
  12. IPavlov

    Bob Shuman Guest

    The sensor is under the vehicle and fairly easy to access. The sensors are
    easy to find if you follow the wiring and can identify the transaxle which
    is under the driver side. You carefully unclip the electrical connector,
    unscrew the sensor, replace with a new one (do not overtighten as they are
    plastic if memory serves correctly, and then inspect, clean if necessary and
    re-attach the connector. Basically about 5-10 minutes overall provided you
    can get access and have a large adjustable wrench or the correct deep
    socket.

    These vans are fairly dependable and even one of these sensors fail (I've
    seen 3 failures in 5 different vehicles over the last 14 years), the limp
    mode (2nd gear) will allow you to get it home or to a service center.

    Bob
     
    Bob Shuman, Apr 17, 2005
    #12
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.