1994 Intrepid 3.5L tranny leak

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by NowItsWhatever, Mar 14, 2006.

  1. Tranny fluid appears to be leaking from the front of the transmission. No
    fluid is leaking from the pan. Any ideas about what the repair will
    involve. 163,000 miles on this tranny. No repairs needed so far. I just
    don't like the mess it makes.
     
    NowItsWhatever, Mar 14, 2006
    #1
  2. NowItsWhatever

    Art Guest

    Going back in memory, I think there is a common leak on the AT pipe that
    goes into the coolant. Same thing on the second generation LH vehicles.
    Mine was fixed by the dealer when I have AT fluid changed. Didn't cost much
    if that is your problem. Make sure they use the right AT fluid with no
    additives.
     
    Art, Mar 15, 2006
    #2
  3. NowItsWhatever

    Steve Guest


    Has this car ever had any transmission work done? If not, then its
    probably still got the original front pump to transmission housing
    O-ring in it, and those were known for leaking over time. Check the
    coolant lines as Art suggested, but those will generally leak right up
    at the very front of the car, near the radiator, on the driver's side.
    If the tranny fluid appears to be coming out of the bellhousing vent
    hole (on the bottom of the rounded portion of the transmission where it
    bolts to the engine block) then my bet is on the pump seal, or (less
    likely) the torque convertor neck seal. Either one requires removing and
    re-installing the transmission, so you might as well think about a total
    rebuild while its out anyway.
     
    Steve, Mar 15, 2006
    #3
  4. You could probably pay a lot less just continuting to put fluid into it
    and wait for the trans to break down. It might be the engine breaks before
    the transmission.

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Mar 15, 2006
    #4
  5. NowItsWhatever

    Steve Guest

    That's true enough, and I did that with my own 1993 3.5/42LE
    engine/trans combo car a number of years ago. But if it is the front
    pump-to-housing seal, it will get to be a pretty fast leak as the seal
    continues to shrink and crack. I got tired of keeping a pan under the
    car and adding a quart every other day. Literally!
    Possible, but not likely in a 94 3.5/42LE combo. The 3.5 in my 93 is now
    at 230,000 miles and running great, but the transmissions in the early
    ones (93, 94) typically don't go far past 150k. Especially not if they
    get leaky and you miss a day of checking it and let it run low on fluid.
    The transmission was on the weak side, but the 3.5 will run forever.
     
    Steve, Mar 15, 2006
    #5
  6. NowItsWhatever

    Art Guest

    Also change the rear AT mount if that hasn't been done if you pull the AT.
     
    Art, Mar 17, 2006
    #6
  7. I did that a while back. Thanks.

     
    NowItsWhatever, Mar 17, 2006
    #7
  8. Thanks for the advice.

    No transmission work done other than fluid/filter changes (about 3 as I
    recall). I'm evaluating whether to repair this car or replace. It's due
    for timing belt/water pump replacements too. Also, drivers side seat
    adjustment (back/forward slide) is broken. Paint keeps flaking off. Vinyl
    on passenger side air bag is shrunk/warped. Fuel gauge reads way too
    optimistically (I have to keep track of my miles between fills). I'm
    beginning to get that inner tie rod bushing clunk again.

    The engine runs like new though. What do you think guys? Is it time to
    dump this rig and move on?
     
    NowItsWhatever, Mar 17, 2006
    #8
  9. Unfortunately that advice is probably going to translate into
    "sell it now while the leak isn't that big and a buyer won't notice it"

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Mar 17, 2006
    #9
  10. NowItsWhatever

    Art Guest

    If the power seat problem is the tracks, Chrysler was fixing the tracks on
    the power seat for free. Call your dealer and see if they are still doing
    it.
     
    Art, Mar 18, 2006
    #10
  11. NowItsWhatever

    Ken Weitzel Guest

    Hi...


    They just happily did mine a few months ago (94 LHS) with absolutely no
    charge :)

    Take care

    Ken
     
    Ken Weitzel, Mar 18, 2006
    #11
  12. NowItsWhatever

    Steve Guest

    From a purely economic standpoint, I'll ALWAYS argue that you're better
    off throwing a few thousand dollars at a car to fix the annoyances,
    rather than wholesale trading for a new or used car. You could rebuild
    the transmission, put in a new fuel pump/sending unit, rebuild the
    suspension, get a seat from a junkyard, and paint the car for under
    $10k. Now ask yourself- could you go out and buy an equivalent car (that
    you're confident in) for that amount of money? Highly doubtful.

    On the other hand, if you're tired of the car then by all means move on.
    But don't pretend that its an economic decision ;D
     
    Steve, Mar 20, 2006
    #12
  13. Interesting point of view. However, even if the repairs you suggest were
    done, along the way there would be things like worn-out wiper motor,
    worn-out ignition switch, worn-out fan motor, worn-out AC compressor, leaky
    radiator, worn-out wheel bearings, pitted windshield, ...... to deal with
    eventually. For all these types of things there are monetary expenses, time
    expenses (mine), plus plus annoyance considerations. I consider the
    annoyance factor to be an economic factor (how much would I pay to avoid the
    inconvenience and annoyance of a breakdown of some sort, or the annoyance of
    being without a vehicle, or the annoyance of doing the repair myself when I
    would rather be playing golf).
     
    NowItsWhatever, Mar 23, 2006
    #13
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.