'00 Grand Caravan SE, which tranny fluid to use?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by MikeWrite, Mar 2, 2004.

  1. MikeWrite

    MikeWrite Guest

    2000 Dodge Grand Caravan SE, 3.3L Flex Fuel engine.

    Friend's van, and I'm a stick guy, so I don't know if P-R-N-D-3-L makes it a
    3-spd or a 4-spd autobox. (Don't know if the reverse gear is counted in
    auto trannies.)

    She lost the owner's manual, and fuckin' Mopar won't let you download one
    for free, unlike Ford. So I've been looking online to find out what tranny
    fluid to use.

    Seems you _can_ use ATF+4 in this model year. What I'm not sure is, do you
    _have_ to? Cause if not, I'd rather buy ATF+3 for her fluid change, rather
    than pay a premium for DC's stupid monopoly on ATF+4. The local dealer sez
    use ATF+4, but I never trust dealers, and particularly not when they
    recommend something only they can sell me.

    I can't find a clear explanation anywhere of when Chrysler went to requiring
    ATF+4, and when ATF+3 was still OK to use.

    Tx.
     
    MikeWrite, Mar 2, 2004
    #1
  2. MikeWrite

    cloaked Guest

    Well if you Google this newsgroup, you will find a HUGE debate about
    various fluid types and additives.

    However, if I recall correctly, the ATF+3 is for use in chysler
    transmissoins built prior to 1996??? (or is that 1998??)

    But anything after that (incl. 2000 model year) the specified fluid is
    ATF+4.

    hth
     
    cloaked, Mar 2, 2004
    #2
  3. MikeWrite

    Greg Houston Guest

    Per TSB 21-16-99, the transition to ATF+4 (Chrsyler Spec 9602) at the factory
    took place at the following dates and serial numbers for each body type:

    **GS** **AFTER NOVEMBER 8, 1999 (MDH1108XX)**
    JA AFTER SEPTEMBER 7, 1998 (MDH0907XX)
    **JX** **AFTER MAY 21, 1999 (MDH0521XX)**
    LH AFTER JULY 20, 1998 (MDH0720XX)
    **NS** **AFTER OCTOBER 10, 1999 (MDH1010XX) WINDSOR ASSY PLANT**
    **AFTER OCTOBER 18, 1999 (MDH1018XX) ST LOUIS ASSY PLANT**
    11TH POSITION OF VIN - R = WINDSOR/B = ST LOUIS
    **PL** **AFTER APRIL 24, 1999 (MDH0424XX)**
    PR AFTER JULY 20, 1998 (MDH0720XX)

    Another TSB specifies which earlier vehicles can/should be switched to ATF+4.
    IIRC, it was all Chrysler vehicles except certain minivans, although that
    exception may no longer be in effect.
     
    Greg Houston, Mar 2, 2004
    #3
  4. MikeWrite

    Jerry Guest

    This will tell you what you need to know.

    http://dodgeram.info/tsb/2001/21-006-01.htm

    Jerry
     
    Jerry, Mar 2, 2004
    #4
  5. Others have posted the links to the authoritative info.
    But *SHE* would rather you use the correct fluid and saver her a ton of
    grief and money down the line.

    DS
     
    Daniel J. Stern, Mar 2, 2004
    #5
  6. MikeWrite

    Greg Houston Guest

    x-no-archive: yes
    Penny Wise, Pound Foolish. Anything you save by using the wrong fluid will be a
    false economy that you will likely pay many times over in repairs. Why not use
    the proper fluid that Chrysler's engineers has determined is proper for your
    transmission? ATF+4 isn't that expensive, everything considered.
     
    Greg Houston, Mar 2, 2004
    #6
  7. MikeWrite

    jdoe Guest

    If you don't trust what the authority on the product sells than by all
    means put dexron/mercon in it or better yet type f. That will make the
    clutches grab real good. ;-)
     
    jdoe, Mar 2, 2004
    #7
  8. ATF+4 unless you want to lose a friend (and a transmission) in the near future.
     
    Richard Benner Jr, Mar 2, 2004
    #8
  9. MikeWrite

    Jerry Guest


    If the vehicle came with ATF+3 and has never been changed over to ATF+4
    then there is no reason not to use ATF+3 in the transmission. Once you
    change over there is no going back. My truck (1999) was sold with ATF+3
    in it and that is all I use. The thing Mike has to be sure about is
    what is in the transmission right now.

    Jerry
     
    Jerry, Mar 2, 2004
    #9
  10. MikeWrite

    MikeWrite Guest

    Um, the "authority on the product" has a monopoly on it and therefore has a
    vested interest in selling it.

    If you believe a given dealership is the real authority on how to repair a
    vehicle and which parts to use, the dealer may love you, but you're being
    naive. Many have come to expensive grief this way.

    And thanks, I've done enough homework to know not to put anything but ATF+X
    in these crappy Chrysler trannys.

    Mike
     
    MikeWrite, Mar 2, 2004
    #10
  11. MikeWrite

    MikeWrite Guest

    Thanks. As I don't know whether this thing came with ATF+4 from the
    factory, it looks like I'd better go with it now.

    Mike
     
    MikeWrite, Mar 2, 2004
    #11
  12. MikeWrite

    MikeWrite Guest

    Yep. I remember there was an insert card in the owner's manual telling her
    to ignore whatever tranny fluid the manual specified and to instead use ...
    well there's the damn thing, I can't remember what the card said, and she
    lost it and the manual. I vaguely remember it saying to not use ATF+X and
    instead use ATF+Y, but which way it went, who knows.

    Gonna stick with ATF+4 to be safe!

    Mike
     
    MikeWrite, Mar 2, 2004
    #12
  13. They become "crappy" if/when you DON'T use the correct fluid.
     
    Richard Benner Jr, Mar 3, 2004
    #13
  14. They do, they hold the patent on the additive package and have only licensed
    it to one manufacturer. Supposedly there is no requirement that this fluid
    producer
    only sell their output to Damlier Chrysler but somehow most of the worlds
    production
    of ATF +4 ends up at DC.

    There are a few leaks, however. I forget who but there's a Canadian
    producer
    that sells ATF +4, and as that producer is also whom makes it for DC, it's
    probably the real thing.

    There's been repeated requests by the fluid manufacturers to DC to license
    the
    patent to them for production. These so far have been ignored. What all
    this
    means is that the second the patent runs out, sometime in the next decade,
    all
    the fluid producers will immediately start selling ATF +4 and to hell with
    what
    DC wants.

    There has always been a kind of gentlemen's agreement with the fluid
    manufacturers
    and the automakers on these issues. When the automakers need a new type of
    fluid they cooperate with the R&D department of a specified fluid
    manufacturer
    and get one custom designed. The deal works out to the maker puts up the
    money
    to make the fluid, then gets to hold the patent until it expires. The fluid
    maker gets
    to license the rights to make it very cheaply then sell it back to the
    maker, and to
    everyone else. Then the fluid makers sell it on the open market and
    everyone makes
    a lot of money. This is how ATF +3 worked out. With ATF +4 Chrysler got
    greedy
    and decided to use ATF+4 as a leverage to get people to come into dealership
    service departments, and to make money off fluid sales. Of course, an
    automaker
    is not setup to distribute fluids and can only do so very inefficiently,
    which is why
    they sell the stuff for the $5 a bottle or whatever rediculous price it is
    now.
    The ONLY saving grace on ATF+4 is that unlike ATF +3 it IS a synthetic
    fluid.
    Thus it in theory can last the life of the car, (not my words, I'll refer
    you to the
    synthetic oil crowd for rediculous claims) and never needs changing. (yeah
    right)

    Ted
     
    Ted Mittelstaedt, Mar 3, 2004
    #14
  15. MikeWrite

    MikeWrite Guest

    On Tuesday I called around and discovered that both our area Chrysler
    dealerships (unrelated ownership) were selling ATF+4 for the same price:
    $7.20/qt. Youch! Still, I felt I had no choice but to get it, to be sure I
    was doing the best thing for my friend's van. (Me to parts guy at
    dealership: "So when's Chrysler gonna let somebody else sell this stuff?"
    Parts guy: "Hopefully never.") So I picked up two gallons and did the
    flush.

    The good flush did the trick. Tranny now behaves properly.

    The bad I needed another two quarts following the flush to achieve
    correct fluid level. So two days later (yesterday) I went back to the same
    dealer for the final two quarts, and guess what - the price had dropped to
    $5.10/qt.

    Doh!!!

    Mike
     
    MikeWrite, Mar 5, 2004
    #15
  16. MikeWrite

    TransSurgeon Guest

    buy the gallon containers

    much cheaper per quart
     
    TransSurgeon, Mar 5, 2004
    #16
  17. MikeWrite

    robs440 Guest

    question.....

    did you buy the qrts from the same guy you bought the gallons from ?
     
    robs440, Mar 6, 2004
    #17
  18. MikeWrite

    MikeWrite Guest

    yep. he said "all our stuff just went down," meaning not just the atf+4.
    The per gallon cost at the time I bought the gallon containers saved very
    little over the $7.20/qt cost, I think the gallon was like $27 versus $28.80
    if I'd bought it per quart.
     
    MikeWrite, Mar 6, 2004
    #18
  19. MikeWrite

    robs440 Guest

    was curious. at times i can go to the parts house and they can give me
    different quotes depending on whos reading the book.

    any way its good to know its coming down some in price now.


     
    robs440, Mar 6, 2004
    #19
  20. MikeWrite

    Cirrus99x Guest

    Yep, I just priced ATF +4 at my local DC dealer in NJ. a couple days ago and it
    was $5 a qt. even.

    Lou
     
    Cirrus99x, Mar 6, 2004
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.